SUBIR.gif) |
 |
Abstract
assessment for Forum IX Twelve reviewers independently reviewed all
of the abstracts submitted for Forum IX. Each abstract was independently assessed
by two reviewers. Each reviewer was blinded to the abstract's authors and to the
other reviewer's identity and assessment. For each abstract, reviewers
were asked to rate study methods and relevance. Finally, they were asked to recommend
whether or not the abstract should be orally presented at Forum IX by selecting
an option on the following scale: "1: definitely yes", "2: probably
yes", "3: probably not", "4: definitely not". Oral
presentations will last 10 minutes, followed by a 5 minute discussion. Due to
time constraints, only 20 studies will be orally presented at Forum IX. Therefore,
only those abstracts classified by both by reviewers as "1", and those
classified as "1" by one reviewer and "2" by the second one,
were selected to be presented as oral presentations. This means that many
abstracts corresponding to sound and relevant studies will have to be presented
as posters. That is why all attendees at Forum IX will be split into groups that
will rotate through all of the posters during the "interactive poster sessions". BREAKDOWN
OF ORAL PRESENTATION SESSIONS - ORAL
SESSION Nº 2.
Thursday, Oct 4th, from 12.15 to 13.00
- ORAL
SESSION Nº 3.
Friday, Oct 5th, from 09.30 to 10.30
- ORAL
SESSION Nº 4.
Friday, Oct 5th, from 16.30 to 17.15
- ORAL
SESSION Nº 5. Saturday, Oct 6th, from 09.30 to 10.30
- ORAL
SESSION Nº 6.
Saturday, Oct 6th, from 12.30 to 13.15
LIST OF ABSTRACTS IN
ALPHABETICAL ORDER (based on the author's surname): AUTHORS | TITLE | Session
in which it will be presented / presentation order within the session | Auvinen
Juha, Tammelin Tuija, Taimela Simo, Zitting Paavo, Järvelin Marjo-Riitta,
Taanila Anja, and Karppinen Jaro. | Are
sleep disturbances a risk factor for neck and low back pains? a longitudinal study
in adolescents. | 1
/ 2 | Bronfort
G, Evans R, Bracha Y, Grimm R. | Chiropractic,
medication and self-care exercise for acute neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.
| 5
/ 1 | Brox
Jens Ivar, Storheim Kjersti, Grotle Margreth, Tveito Torill H., Indahl Aage, Eriksen
Hege R. | Evidence
based review of back schools, brief education, and fear-avoidance training for
chronic low back pain. | 6
/ 3 | Carnes
D., Underwood M. | The
importance of monitoring patient ability to achieve functional tasks in those
with low back pain. | 2
/ 3 | Carragee
Eugene. | Does
a self-reported degree of back pain problems have internal validity? A study of
back pain in United States Army Reserve soldiers. | 6
/ 1 | Côté
Pierre, Boyle Eleanor and Hogg-Johnson Shielah. | Risk
of vertebrobasilar artery stroke from chiropractic care: a population-based, case-control
and case-crossover study. | 4
/ 3 | Cherkin
D, Sherman K, Barlow WF, Delaney K, Erro J, Hawkes R, Ichikawa L , Avins A, Hamilton
L, Pressman, A, Deyo R , Khalsa PS | Is
Acupuncture Needling Effective for Chronic Back Pain? Results of an RCT | 5
/ 2 | Fritz
Julie, Brennan Gerard, Cleland Joshua. | Does
Adherence to Evidence-Based Recommendations Improve Quality of Care for Patients
with Acute Low Back Pain Receiving Physical Therapy? | 5
/ 4 | Gross
DP, Battié MC, Asante AK | Validation
Of A Short-Form Functional Capacity Evaluation: Results From A Cluster Randomized
Controlled Trial. | 6
/ 2 | Hancock
Mark J, Maher Christopher G, Latimer Jane, McLachlan Andrew J, Cooper Chris W,
Day Richard O, Spindler Megan F, McAuley James H. | Addition
of NSAIDS and/or manipulation to advice and paracetamol does not speed recovery
from acute low back pain. | 5
/ 3 | Henschke
N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Bleasel J, York J, Das A, and
McAuley JH. | Diagnosis
of serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care with acute
low back pain. | 1
/ 1 | Holm
Lena W, Carroll Linda J, Cassidy J David, Ahlbom Anders. | Do
persons' expectations for recovery matter for the prognosis of neck and back pain
after traffic collision? | 2
/ 1 | Kent
P.M., Keating J.L., Buchbinder R. | Searching
for a conceptual framework for nonspecific low back pain. | 1
/ 3 | Lauridsen
Henrik H., Manniche Claus, Korsholm Lars, Grunnet-Nilsson Niels, Hartvigsen Jan.
| Are
low back pain patients able to determine acceptable outcome of treatment before
it begins? | 3
/ 1 | O'Connor
Denise, Green Sally, French Simon, King Sharon, Francis Jill, Grimshaw Jeremy,
Michie Susan, McKenzie Joanne, Spike Neil, Schattner Peter and the IMPLEMENT Study
Group. | Identifying
general practitioner beliefs, intentions and behaviour toward uptake of an evidence-based
guideline for acute low-back pain using the theory of planned behaviour. | 2
/ 2 | Ostelo
Raymond WJG, Deyo Rick, Stratford Paul W, Waddell Gordon, Croft Peter, Von Korff
Michael, Bouter Lex M, de Vet Henrica CW. | Interpreting
change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: Towards interantional
consensus regarding minimal important change. | 3
/ 2 | Peul
W., van Houwelingen H C, van den Hout W, Brand R, Eekhof J A, Tans J Th., Thomeer
R, Koes B. | Surgery
versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. | 4
/ 2 | Steenstra
IA, Lee H, Vidmar M, Hogg-Johnson SJ, Franche RL, Côté P. | Defining
return to work, examples from the Early Claimants Cohort. | 3
/ 4 | Zamora
J,Kovacs F, Abraira V, Royuela A, Corcoll J, Alegre L, Cano A,and the Spanish
Back Pain Research Network. | Minimal
Clinically Important Change For Pain Intensity And Disability In Patients With
Nonspecific Low Back Pain. | 3
/ 3 | Zamora
J,Kovacs F,Abraira V,Corcoll J,Muriel A, Alegre L, Mir MA, and the Spanish Back
Pain Research Network. | Prognostic
factors for neuroreflexotherapy in the treatment of subacute and chronic neck
and back pain. A study of predictors of clinical outcome in routine practice of
the Spanish National Health Service. | 4
/ 1 |
| | |
