Amsterdam International Forum VIII: Workshops
  Amsterdam International Forum VIII
PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH ON LOW BACK PAIN
 

Back to workshop overview

W2.2

Title:  Lessons learned from recent Psychosocial Interventions: Implications for Research

Authors and affiliation: Elaine M Hay 1, Chris J.Main 1, and Danielle van der Windt 2

1 Keele University; Staffs; U.K.
2 EMGO Institute, VU university medical centre ; Amsterdam, Netherlands

Email address: cjmain@gmail.com

Introduction: Research over the last decade has demonstrated the importance of psychosocial factors in the development of chronic musculoskeletal problems (Linton,2000) and in recent years there has been a move to provide primary care interventions within a psychosocial framework, derived from the cognitive-behavioural perspective.

Objective: The purpose of the proposed workshop is four-fold.

  1. To integrate the findings of these trials with other studies of early psychosocial interventions.
  2. To offer some additional analyses and reflections on the Keele and EMGO data sets
  3. To identify the research challenges posed by the findings
  4. To facilitate discussion with a view to arriving at a consensus on a refocused research agenda for early psychosocial intervention and disseminate the conclusions in the form of an article/editorial
Methods / content: Some years ago Klaber-Moffett et al(1999) found a brief psychosocial intervention to be superior to “treatment-as-usual” in terms of outcome disability scores, although the differences were small. Hay et al (2005) compared manual therapy with a simple individualised pain management approach delivered by physiotherapists trained in a psychosocial interview & intervention strategy, but there was little difference between the two groups in level of disability at one year F.U. Jellema et al (2005) trained a group of G.P.s to manage biopsychosocial risk factors for poor outcome but were unable to demonstrate any effect over treatment as usual.
There are a number of possible explanations for these “negative” results (Jellema et al,2006; Main,2005) which raise a number of fundamental questions about the nature of psychosocial intervention and their evaluation in these trials.Format of WorkshopThe three presenters will offer a brief overview focusing on
  1. The nature of interventions
  2. Issues of competency and training in the delivery of interventions
  3. Choice/development of process/outcome measures
  4. The methodological options for research design, including screening, targeting within a hypothesis-led framework
The audience will then be allocated to working groups focusing in turn on two of the four topics. The workshop will conclude with audience report-back, summary of consensus and draft structure of a publication to disseminate the conclusions.





workshop
free paper presentations
poster presentations




Last updated: May 23 2006; Email: lbpforum8@vumc.nl